FANDOM

Cryptar

aka Cryptar

Admin Discussions Moderator
  • I live in England, UK
  • I am Male
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • 55d5c3104dab7154578b4569
      Loading editor
  • In The Return of Chef, Kenny definitely says more than 3 words here, but unfortunately, I can't figure out his muffled speach.

    Kyle Something must have happened to Chef while he was gone. Maybe he hit his head or, or got stuck in some quantum time vortex.
    Stan Well look, he spent the last three months with that adventurers' club. Maybe they know what happened to him.
    Kenny (muffled) Yeah! I think...
    Cartman Yeah!
    Kyle  

    All right, come on guys!

    Unowninator (talk) 02:55, September 19, 2018 (UTC)

      Loading editor
    • I'll look into it, I'll see if the DVD has the subs ;)

        Loading editor
    • Interestingly, the DVD subs doesn't even show the "I think" part, though I agree that part is the only one that is clear. I beleive after that, Matt stone was just using gibberish and it was used a a joke.

        Loading editor
    • Oh, really? That's disappointing. When I heard him talking, I interpretted it as "Yeah. I say we go to the Super Adventure Club, and maybe then we'll see what's wrong." But I was only confident in the first half of that.

      Oh well, thanks for checking. Unowninator (talk) 15:20, September 19, 2018 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • What am I doing wrong?

      Loading editor
    • This section tels you all you need to know but article comments can only be about how to improve the article.

        Loading editor
    • But you are also not allowed to remove messages from administrators without asking them. Everything was in the template that you needed to know. I will put it back now as it tells us you have already been warned but it does nothing against your conduct other than that.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Cryptar. i wanna say that you've been a nice user to me.

      Loading editor
  • Hey, regarding this edit, __TOC__ will not place the table of contents, it is used to move the table of contents (if the table exists; if the table doesn't exists, then __FORCETOC__ should be used). For example if I want the table of contents to be at the middle of the article, I can type __TOC__ right at the middle of the article. __FORCETOC__ is for placing the table of contents if the article doesn't have at least 4 headings and __TOC__ is for moving it. I hope this will clear the confusions.

      Loading editor
    • Noted. TBH I plan to clean out that section of the sandbox when this is cleared up. Should I insert that right after the last item in the template coding if we're all good?

      I'm not used to template coding as you can tell. Will be late to seeing a reply as I'm going to bed :V

        Loading editor
    • Hmm...Charlie will take a look on the situation this weekend.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hiya, just wanted to ask a tiny little thing. Commonly the term "silenced" has been coined for a surpressed weapon, however the technical term for it is "surpressed" by the Military and by Firearms Specialists. I've seen pages that uses the term "silenced" rather than "surpressed". Which do you think is more appropriate for the matter?

      Loading editor
    • Yea I know what you mean, I would say personally that 'suppressed' is the most correct term as there are few times that a weapon could be considered 'truly silenced' although you could debate by hearing the action it is still not a silent weapon. Anyhow, the incorrect term is the most common in use so is quickly understood to the general audience that reads the wiki. Also, enthusiasts could debate all day how to pronounce 'cupola' [on a tank/armoured vehicle] but it could be seen as something that doesn't matter. Somewhat relevant, even the 'official term' for a small pistol, "derringer", is actually a misspelling of the last name of Henry Deringer. So even though I think it's a good idea my own standing could be defeated by, 'did the person understand what you meant?' and the answer is most people would probably say no.

      But maybe it would be worth starting a discussion post to see what others think. For now I will log the pages with such mentions on my sandbox in that section.

        Loading editor
    • I'm compiling this list for the sandbox now but do let me know if I miss any that you have seen.

        Loading editor
    • Thanks for the response. I'll be on the look out.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey there! Welcome back and great edits you've been making! I've noticed you were a former administrator and I'm curious if you're interested in joining the current team? Feel free to reach out to me if you need anything and it's great to have you back!

      Loading editor
    • Thanks well it's helped that I've started going over the episodes again and listening to commentary ;) Well it's funny I've been thinking this over, the problem is I can't guarantee how long I will be on the wiki for because I sometimes have these spurts of activity that trails off. I wouldn't mind having it attached to my profile again but it would likely make me an "inactive admin". However, there have been one or two instances recently where I could have caught something; like even when I don't edit I essentially 'patrol' the recent activity. Anyway, the summary is I would not say no but I would not be offended if you felt it would be redundant.

        Loading editor
    • I certainly don't want to force you into anything but just know that the invitation is always there! :) Also worth noting the best way to communicate with us aside from the wiki is with our Discord.

        Loading editor
    • Both noted, I haven't been on there yet but I've never been much of a live chat person lol.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Cryptar, vote cheating is taking place on the "Thoughts About" blog post. I'm going to use a new format for the future, but this may mean that I do the blog posts next time. We can split it up, if you'd like. I really like your format for the press releases. So you can do those, and I'll do the other(s). What do you think?

      Loading editor
    • OK I will do the press release and you can do the post episode thoughts. Shame to hear it but never mind. I don't get the point in vote cheating anyway.

        Loading editor
    • Yea, in a short period of time there were over 30 votes for "the worst episode ever". Definitely raised a red flag.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey, Cryptar. Nikolaitttt is still an administrator, just to let you know.

      Loading editor
    • Yes I know, he is also a bureaucrat so I would have hoped he would have taken this off himself.

        Loading editor
    • Gameplaya evidently left it in case he wantyed to come back, which it doesn't look like he does and it can always be sorted later if that does happen.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Why did you post two blog posts for "Going Native"?

      Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message